Compliance Hub

Enhanced Due Diligence: BSP Guidelines & Key Considerations

Site Logo
Tookitaki
7 min
read

In today’s increasingly regulated financial landscape, ensuring compliance with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) regulations is crucial for any business operating in the Philippines. For foreign corporations, the stakes are even higher, as they must navigate not only local laws but also international standards. Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) plays a critical role in this compliance framework.

Unlike standard customer due diligence (CDD), which is required for all customers, EDD involves a more rigorous process designed to address higher-risk scenarios, particularly for foreign corporations. Understanding and implementing EDD is not just about regulatory compliance; it’s about safeguarding your business from risks such as money laundering and terrorist financing.

Understanding Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) under BSP Regulations

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) is a crucial process that goes beyond the standard Customer Due Diligence (CDD) required by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP). While CDD involves basic identity verification and risk assessment for all customers, EDD is specifically designed for situations where a higher risk of money laundering, terrorist financing, or other financial crimes is identified.

{{cta-first}}

EDD requires financial institutions and corporations to conduct more detailed investigations and continuous monitoring of high-risk customers. This includes gathering additional information about the customer's identity, business operations, and financial history, as well as understanding the purpose of their transactions. For foreign corporations operating in the Philippines, EDD is often necessary due to the complexity and potential risks associated with cross-border transactions.

BSP regulations mandate that financial institutions apply EDD in various situations, such as when dealing with politically exposed persons (PEPs), entities from high-risk countries, or complex corporate structures. The goal is to ensure that any potential risks are identified and mitigated before they can pose a threat to the financial system.

BSP's Requirements for Foreign Corporations

Foreign corporations operating in the Philippines are subject to specific Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) requirements under BSP regulations. These requirements are in place to address the unique risks associated with international businesses, which often involve complex structures and cross-border transactions.

One of the key EDD requirements for foreign corporations is the need for a thorough understanding of the corporation’s ownership structure. BSP mandates that financial institutions identify and verify the ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs) of foreign corporations to ensure that the true owners behind these entities are known and not using the corporation as a cover for illicit activities. This includes scrutinizing any intermediaries or shell companies that may be part of the ownership chain.

Another important aspect is the ongoing monitoring of the corporation’s transactions. BSP requires that foreign corporations with higher risk profiles be subject to continuous monitoring, where their transactions are regularly reviewed for any unusual or suspicious activity. This helps in detecting and preventing money laundering and other financial crimes that could be facilitated through international channels.

Foreign corporations must also provide detailed information on the purpose of their business activities in the Philippines, including the nature of their transactions and the sources of their funds. This transparency is essential for ensuring compliance with BSP’s EDD requirements and for mitigating any potential risks associated with their operations.

Compliance with BSP Circulars and Memos

Navigating the regulatory landscape set by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) can be challenging, especially for foreign corporations required to comply with specific Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) regulations. BSP has issued various circulars and memoranda that outline the requirements and expectations for EDD, making it crucial for foreign corporations to stay updated and ensure full compliance.

One of the key documents in this regard is BSP Circular 1022, which provides detailed guidelines on the implementation of EDD measures. This circular emphasizes the importance of a risk-based approach, where financial institutions must assess the risk levels of their clients and apply enhanced measures accordingly. For foreign corporations, this means that any perceived higher risk due to factors like cross-border transactions or complex ownership structures will necessitate more rigorous scrutiny.

In addition to Circular 1022, there are other BSP memos that periodically update or clarify the requirements for EDD. These documents often address emerging risks or provide additional guidance on how to implement EDD measures effectively. For foreign corporations, this means maintaining a proactive approach to compliance—regularly reviewing and adapting their EDD processes to align with the latest BSP directives.

Ensuring compliance with these circulars and memos is not just about avoiding penalties; it is about protecting the integrity of the financial system and maintaining the trust of stakeholders. Foreign corporations must establish a robust framework that allows them to quickly adapt to regulatory changes and maintain compliance at all times.

Best Practices for Implementing EDD

Implementing Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) effectively is crucial for financial institutions to meet BSP requirements and manage their risk exposure. Given the complexities involved, adopting best practices can help ensure that EDD processes are thorough, efficient, and compliant with regulatory standards.

Risk Assessment Strategies for Foreign Corporations

A fundamental aspect of EDD is conducting a comprehensive risk assessment. Financial institutions must identify and evaluate the risks associated with their business activities, customer base, and geographic regions. This involves analyzing factors such as the nature of transactions, the countries involved, and the type of customers. High-risk customers or activities should be subject to more stringent EDD measures. By tailoring the EDD process to the specific risks identified, corporations can focus their resources on areas that pose the greatest threat.

Integration of Technology and Automation in EDD Processes

In today’s digital age, relying solely on manual processes for EDD is not only inefficient but also prone to errors. Incorporating advanced technology into the EDD workflow can significantly enhance the accuracy and efficiency of the process. Automation tools can help in data collection, risk scoring, and continuous monitoring, allowing corporations to quickly identify and respond to potential risks. By integrating these tools into their existing compliance frameworks, financial institutions can ensure that their EDD processes are both scalable and sustainable.

Role of Technology in EDD Compliance

The complexity and scale of Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) processes, especially for foreign corporations, make the use of advanced technology not just advantageous but essential. Technology plays a pivotal role in ensuring that EDD is conducted efficiently, accurately, and in compliance with Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) regulations.

Overview of Advanced Technology Solutions for EDD

Modern EDD processes require sophisticated tools that can handle vast amounts of data, perform real-time analysis, and adapt to evolving regulatory requirements. Advanced technology solutions, such as machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI), can automate many aspects of EDD. These technologies can sift through large datasets to identify patterns, assess risks, and flag suspicious activities, which would be impossible to achieve manually at the same speed and accuracy.

How Tools Like Tookitaki’s FinCense Can Assist in Meeting EDD Requirements

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform is an example of how technology can be leveraged to meet EDD requirements effectively. FinCense integrates various modules that support comprehensive compliance workflows, from screening and risk assessment to transaction monitoring. It uses AI and machine learning to continuously improve its ability to detect and prevent financial crimes. By integrating with Tookitaki’s Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem, FinCense ensures that its models are up-to-date with the latest threat intelligence, enabling foreign corporations to stay ahead of potential risks.

FinCense also offers features like automated threshold tuning, scenario testing, and context-aware modelling, which help in reducing false positives and enhancing the quality of alerts. This not only ensures compliance with BSP’s stringent EDD regulations but also improves operational efficiency by allowing compliance teams to focus on genuine risks rather than sifting through irrelevant alerts.

Importance of Real-Time Updates and Continuous Monitoring

In the fast-paced world of financial transactions, real-time updates and continuous monitoring are critical. The ability to monitor transactions as they occur and to receive real-time updates about potential risks is a key advantage of using advanced technology in EDD. Continuous monitoring helps foreign corporations quickly identify and respond to suspicious activities, ensuring that they remain compliant with BSP regulations and effectively mitigate risks.

Technology solutions like FinCense provide this capability, allowing corporations to adapt to changes instantly and maintain a robust EDD framework that evolves with emerging threats. By leveraging such tools, foreign corporations can ensure they are not only compliant but also proactive in their risk management strategies.

{{cta-guide}}

Consequences of Non-Compliance with BSP’s EDD Regulations

Non-compliance with the Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) regulations set by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) can have serious repercussions for foreign corporations operating in the Philippines. The BSP has made it clear that adherence to these regulations is not optional, and failure to comply can result in significant penalties and operational setbacks.

Potential Penalties and Repercussions for Foreign Corporations

The BSP enforces strict penalties for non-compliance, which can include hefty fines, sanctions, and even the suspension of licenses to operate within the country. These penalties are designed to deter financial institutions and corporations from neglecting their EDD obligations, emphasizing the importance of rigorous compliance processes. For foreign corporations, the impact of such penalties can be even more severe, potentially leading to reputational damage that could affect their global operations.

Beyond financial penalties, non-compliance can also lead to increased scrutiny from regulators, both within the Philippines and internationally. This heightened scrutiny can result in more frequent audits, prolonged investigations, and a loss of trust among stakeholders, including clients, partners, and investors. In some cases, persistent non-compliance can lead to the revocation of licenses, effectively barring the corporation from conducting business in the Philippines.

Importance of Maintaining a Robust EDD Framework

Given these potential consequences, it is crucial for foreign corporations to maintain a robust EDD framework. This involves not only implementing the necessary processes and technologies to meet BSP’s requirements but also fostering a culture of compliance within the organization. Regular training, continuous monitoring, and a proactive approach to risk management are essential components of an effective EDD framework.

By staying compliant with BSP’s EDD regulations, financial institutions can avoid the significant costs and disruptions associated with non-compliance. More importantly, they can ensure that they are contributing to the integrity of the financial system and safeguarding their business against the risks of financial crime.

Final Thoughts

In the complex and highly regulated financial environment of the Philippines, compliance with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) requirements is not just a legal obligation but a critical component of risk management for foreign corporations. By understanding the specific requirements set forth by BSP, implementing best practices, and leveraging advanced technology solutions like Tookitaki’s FinCense, foreign corporations can effectively manage their risk exposure and ensure compliance.

The consequences of non-compliance can be severe, including significant financial penalties, reputational damage, and operational disruptions. Therefore, maintaining a robust and proactive EDD framework is essential. This framework should include continuous monitoring, real-time updates, and a strong emphasis on the integration of technology to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of EDD processes.

If you are a financial institution operating in the Philippines, now is the time to evaluate your EDD framework. Are you confident that your current processes meet BSP’s stringent requirements? Are you leveraging the latest technology to stay ahead of potential risks?

Learn more about how Tookitaki’s FinCense platform can help you streamline your EDD processes, ensure compliance with BSP regulations, and protect your business from the risks associated with financial crime. Contact us today to find out how we can support your compliance needs.

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
20 Jan 2026
6 min
read

What Makes the Best AML Software? A Singapore Perspective

“Best” isn’t about brand—it’s about fit, foresight, and future readiness.

When compliance teams search for the “best AML software,” they often face a sea of comparisons and vendor rankings. But in reality, what defines the best tool for one institution may fall short for another. In Singapore’s dynamic financial ecosystem, the definition of “best” is evolving.

This blog explores what truly makes AML software best-in-class—not by comparing products, but by unpacking the real-world needs, risks, and expectations shaping compliance today.

Talk to an Expert

The New AML Challenge: Scale, Speed, and Sophistication

Singapore’s status as a global financial hub brings increasing complexity:

  • More digital payments
  • More cross-border flows
  • More fintech integration
  • More complex money laundering typologies

Regulators like MAS are raising the bar on detection effectiveness, timeliness of reporting, and technological governance. Meanwhile, fraudsters continue to adapt faster than many internal systems.

In this environment, the best AML software is not the one with the longest feature list—it’s the one that evolves with your institution’s risk.

What “Best” Really Means in AML Software

1. Local Regulatory Fit

AML software must align with MAS regulations—from risk-based assessments to STR formats and AI auditability. A tool not tuned to Singapore’s AML Notices or thematic reviews will create gaps, even if it’s globally recognised.

2. Real-World Scenario Coverage

The best solutions include coverage for real, contextual typologies such as:

  • Shell company misuse
  • Utility-based layering scams
  • Dormant account mule networks
  • Round-tripping via fintech platforms

Bonus points if these scenarios come from a network of shared intelligence.

3. AI You Can Explain

The best AML platforms use AI that’s not just powerful—but also understandable. Compliance teams should be able to explain detection decisions to auditors, regulators, and internal stakeholders.

4. Unified View Across Risk

Modern compliance risk doesn't sit in silos. The best software unifies alerts, customer profiles, transactions, device intelligence, and behavioural risk signals—across both fraud and AML workflows.

5. Automation That Actually Works

From auto-generating STRs to summarising case narratives, top AML tools reduce manual work without sacrificing oversight. Automation should support investigators, not replace them.

6. Speed to Deploy, Speed to Detect

The best tools integrate quickly, scale with your transaction volume, and adapt fast to new typologies. In a live environment like Singapore, detection lag can mean regulatory risk.

The Danger of Chasing Global Rankings

Many institutions fall into the trap of selecting tools based on brand recognition or analyst reports. While useful, these often prioritise global market size over local relevance.

A top-ranked solution may not:

  • Support MAS-specific STR formats
  • Detect local mule account typologies
  • Allow configuration without vendor dependence
  • Offer support in your timezone or regulatory context

The best AML software for Singapore is one that understands Singapore.

The Role of Community and Collaboration

No tool can solve financial crime alone. The best AML platforms today are:

  • Collaborative: Sharing anonymised risk signals across institutions
  • Community-driven: Updated with new scenarios and typologies from peers
  • Connected: Integrated with ecosystems like MAS’ regulatory sandbox or industry groups

This allows banks to move faster on emerging threats like pig-butchering scams, cross-border laundering, or terror finance alerts.

ChatGPT Image Jan 20, 2026, 10_31_21 AM

Case in Point: A Smarter Approach to Typology Detection

Imagine your institution receives a surge in transactions through remittance corridors tied to high-risk jurisdictions. A traditional system may miss this if it’s below a certain threshold.

But a scenario-based system—especially one built from real cases—flags:

  • Round dollar amounts at unusual intervals
  • Back-to-back remittances to different names in the same region
  • Senders with low prior activity suddenly transacting at volume

The “best” software is the one that catches this before damage is done.

A Checklist for Singaporean Institutions

If you’re evaluating AML tools, ask:

  • Can this detect known local risks and unknown emerging ones?
  • Does it support real-time and batch monitoring across channels?
  • Can compliance teams tune thresholds without engineering help?
  • Does the vendor offer localised support and regulatory alignment?
  • How well does it integrate with fraud tools, case managers, and reporting systems?

If the answer isn’t a confident “yes” across these areas, it might not be your best choice—no matter its global rating.

Final Thoughts: Build for Your Risk, Not the Leaderboard

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform embodies these principles—offering MAS-aligned features, community-driven scenarios, explainable AI, and unified fraud and AML coverage tailored to Asia’s compliance landscape.

There’s no universal best AML software.

But for institutions in Singapore, the best choice will always be one that:

  • Supports your regulators
  • Reflects your risk
  • Grows with your customers
  • Learns from your industry
  • Protects your reputation

Because when it comes to financial crime, it’s not about the software that looks best on paper—it’s about the one that works best in practice.

What Makes the Best AML Software? A Singapore Perspective
Blogs
19 Jan 2026
5 min
read

AML Case Management Software: A Practical Guide for Banks and Fintechs

Financial institutions today face an uncomfortable reality. Detecting suspicious activity is no longer the hardest part of AML. Managing, investigating, documenting, and closing alerts at scale is. This is where AML case management software plays a critical role.

As alert volumes rise and regulatory expectations tighten, banks and fintechs need more than rule engines and dashboards. They need a structured, auditable, and efficient way to move from alert to closure. This guide explains what AML case management software is, why it matters, and how modern, AI-enabled platforms are reshaping investigations.

Talk to an Expert

What Is AML Case Management?

AML case management refers to the process and technology used to manage alerts, investigations, evidence, and regulatory outcomes once suspicious activity has been detected.

In simple terms:

  • Transaction monitoring flags alerts
  • Case management turns alerts into investigations
  • Investigations lead to decisions, documentation, and reporting

A case management system provides investigators with a central workspace to:

  • Review alerts
  • Gather and assess evidence
  • Collaborate with other teams
  • Document findings
  • Prepare regulatory reports such as STRs or SARs

Without a robust case management layer, even the best detection systems quickly become operational bottlenecks.

Why AML Case Management Matters More Than Ever

Alert volumes are increasing

Real-time payments, digital wallets, and cross-border transactions have dramatically increased alert volumes. Manual investigation processes simply do not scale.

Investigators are under pressure

Compliance teams face growing workloads, tight deadlines, and intense regulatory scrutiny. Inefficient workflows lead to:

  • Alert backlogs
  • Investigator fatigue
  • Inconsistent decision-making

Regulators expect stronger documentation

Supervisors increasingly expect:

  • Clear audit trails
  • Consistent investigation logic
  • Explainable decisions supported by evidence

AML case management software sits at the centre of these challenges, acting as the operational backbone of compliance teams.

Core Capabilities of AML Case Management Software

A modern AML case management platform typically includes the following capabilities:

Case creation and prioritisation

Alerts are automatically converted into cases, enriched with customer, transaction, and risk context. Risk-based prioritisation helps investigators focus on the most critical cases first.

Investigation workflows

Structured workflows guide investigators through each stage of the investigation, reducing variability and missed steps.

Evidence management

Documents, transaction records, screenshots, and notes are stored centrally within each case, ensuring nothing is lost or fragmented across systems.

Collaboration and escalation

Cases often require input from multiple teams. Case management software enables collaboration, escalation, and approvals within a controlled environment.

Audit trails and traceability

Every action taken on a case is logged, creating a defensible audit trail for internal reviews and regulatory examinations.

How AI Is Transforming AML Case Management

Traditional case management systems focused primarily on task tracking. Modern platforms are moving much further by embedding intelligence directly into investigations.

Assisted investigations

AI can surface relevant transactions, related parties, and historical patterns, reducing manual data gathering.

Smart workflows

Automation helps route cases, trigger actions, and apply consistent investigation steps based on risk level.

Faster alert closure

By reducing repetitive tasks and guiding investigators, AI-enabled case management significantly improves closure times without compromising quality.

The result is not fewer controls, but better, faster, and more consistent investigations.

Regulatory Expectations and Audit Readiness

From an examiner’s perspective, a strong AML programme is not just about detecting suspicious activity. It is about how decisions are made and documented.

AML case management software supports regulatory expectations by enabling:

  • Consistent investigation logic
  • Complete documentation of decisions
  • Easy retrieval of historical cases
  • Clear linkage between alerts, evidence, and outcomes

This is especially important during regulatory reviews, where institutions must demonstrate not only what decisions were made, but why.

ChatGPT Image Jan 17, 2026, 12_53_47 PM

How Banks and Fintechs Use AML Case Management in Practice

In a typical investigation flow:

  1. An alert is generated by the monitoring system
  2. A case is created and assigned automatically
  3. The investigator reviews contextual data and risk indicators
  4. Evidence is gathered and assessed within the case
  5. A decision is made, documented, and approved
  6. Regulatory reports are prepared if required
  7. The case is closed with a complete audit trail

Case management software ensures this process is repeatable, defensible, and scalable, even as volumes grow.

How Modern AML Platforms Approach Case Management

Modern AML platforms are increasingly embedding case management directly into their compliance architecture. Rather than treating investigations as a separate, manual process, leading solutions integrate case management with transaction monitoring and screening to create a continuous investigation workflow.

For example, Tookitaki’s FinCense platform integrates case management with transaction monitoring and screening, enabling investigators to move seamlessly from alert generation to investigation, documentation, and closure within a single workflow. This integrated approach helps institutions improve investigation efficiency while maintaining strong audit trails and regulatory readiness.

Choosing the Right AML Case Management Software

When evaluating AML case management solutions, institutions should look beyond basic task tracking.

Key considerations include:

  • Seamless integration with transaction monitoring and screening systems
  • Support for risk-based workflows
  • Strong audit and reporting capabilities
  • AI-assisted investigation features
  • Flexibility to adapt to local regulatory requirements

The goal is not just operational efficiency, but long-term compliance resilience.

Final Thoughts

AML case management software is no longer a supporting tool. It is a core pillar of modern AML operations.

As financial crime grows more complex, institutions that invest in intelligent, well-structured case management are better positioned to:

  • Reduce operational strain
  • Improve investigation quality
  • Meet regulatory expectations with confidence

In the broader AML ecosystem, case management is where detection becomes decision-making — and where compliance teams either struggle or succeed.

AML Case Management Software: A Practical Guide for Banks and Fintechs
Blogs
16 Jan 2026
5 min
read

From Firefighting to Foresight: Rethinking Transaction Fraud Prevention in Singapore

Fraudsters are playing a smarter game, shouldn’t your defences be smarter too?

Transaction fraud in Singapore is no longer just a security issue—it’s a strategic challenge. As payment ecosystems evolve, fraudsters are exploiting digital rails, behavioural loopholes, and siloed detection systems to slip through unnoticed.

In this blog, we explore why traditional fraud prevention methods are falling short, what a next-gen transaction fraud prevention framework looks like, and how Singapore’s financial institutions can future-proof their defences.

Talk to an Expert

Why Transaction Fraud is Escalating in Singapore

Singapore has one of the most advanced digital banking infrastructures in the world. But with innovation comes risk.

Key Drivers of Fraud Risk:

  • Real-time payments: PayNow and FAST leave little time for fraud detection.
  • Cross-border flows: Illicit funds are moved via remittance corridors and fintech platforms.
  • Proliferation of fintech apps: Fraudsters exploit weak KYC and transaction monitoring in niche apps.
  • Evolving scam tactics: Social engineering, deepfake impersonation, and phishing are on the rise.

The result? Singaporean banks are experiencing a surge in mule account activity, identity theft, and layered fraud involving multiple platforms.

What is Transaction Fraud Prevention?

Transaction fraud prevention refers to systems, strategies, and intelligence tools used by financial institutions to:

  • Detect fraudulent transactions
  • Stop or flag suspicious activity in real time
  • Reduce customer losses
  • Comply with regulatory expectations

The key is prevention, not just detection. This means acting before money is moved or damage is done.

Traditional Fraud Prevention: Where It Falls Short

Legacy fraud prevention frameworks often rely on:

  • Static rule-based thresholds
  • After-the-fact detection
  • Manual reviews for high-value alerts
  • Limited visibility across products or platforms

The problem? Fraud today is fast, adaptive, and complex. These outdated approaches miss subtle patterns, overwhelm investigators, and delay intervention.

A New Framework for Transaction Fraud Prevention

Next-gen fraud prevention combines speed, context, intelligence, and collaboration.

Core Elements:

1. Real-Time Transaction Monitoring

Every transaction is assessed for risk as it happens—across all payment channels.

2. Behavioural Risk Models

Fraud detection engines compare current actions against baseline behaviour for each customer.

3. AI-Powered Risk Scoring

Advanced machine learning models assign dynamic risk scores that influence real-time decisions.

4. Federated Typology Sharing

Institutions access fraud scenarios shared by peer banks and regulators without exposing sensitive data.

5. Graph-Based Network Detection

Analysts visualise connections between mule accounts, devices, locations, and beneficiaries.

6. Integrated Case Management

Suspicious transactions are directly escalated into investigation pipelines with enriched context.

Real-World Examples of Preventable Fraud

✅ Utility Scam Layering

Scammers use stolen accounts to pay fake utility bills, then request chargebacks to mask laundering. These can be caught through layered transaction patterns.

✅ Deepfake CEO Voice Scam

A finance team almost transfers SGD 500,000 after receiving a video call from a “CFO.” Behavioural anomalies and device risk profiling can flag this in real-time.

✅ Organised Mule Account Chains

Funds pass through 8–10 sleeper accounts before exiting the system. Graph analytics expose these as coordinated rather than isolated events.

The Singapore Edge: Localising Fraud Prevention

Fraud patterns in Singapore have unique characteristics:

  • Local scam syndicates often use SingPass and SMS spoofing
  • Elderly victims targeted through impersonation scams
  • Fintech apps used for layering due to fewer controls

A good fraud prevention system should reflect:

  • MAS typologies and alerts
  • Red flags derived from real scam cases
  • Adaptability to local payment systems like FAST, PayNow, GIRO
ChatGPT Image Jan 16, 2026, 11_40_33 AM

How Tookitaki Enables Smart Transaction Fraud Prevention

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform offers an integrated fraud and AML prevention suite that:

  • Monitors transactions in real-time using adaptive AI and federated learning
  • Supports scenario-based detection built from 1,200+ community-contributed typologies
  • Surfaces network-level risk signals using graph analytics
  • Auto-generates case summaries for faster STR filing and reporting
  • Reduces false positives while increasing true fraud detection rates

With FinCense, banks are moving from passive alerts to proactive intervention.

Evaluating Transaction Fraud Prevention Software: Key Questions

  • Can it monitor all transaction types in real time?
  • Does it allow dynamic threshold tuning based on risk?
  • Can it integrate with existing AML or case management tools?
  • Does it use real-world scenarios, not just abstract rules?
  • Can it support regulatory audits with explainable decisions?

Best Practices for Proactive Fraud Prevention

  1. Combine fraud and AML views for holistic oversight
  2. Use shared typologies to learn from others’ incidents
  3. Deploy AI responsibly, ensuring interpretability
  4. Flag anomalies early, even if not yet confirmed as fraud
  5. Engage fraud operations teams in model tuning and validation

Looking Ahead: Future of Transaction Fraud Prevention

The future of fraud prevention is:

  • Predictive: Using AI to simulate fraud before it happens
  • Collaborative: Sharing signals across banks and fintechs
  • Contextual: Understanding customer intent, not just rules
  • Embedded: Integrated into every step of the payment journey

As Singapore’s financial sector continues to grow in scale and complexity, fraud prevention must keep pace—not just in technology, but in mindset.

Final Thoughts: Don’t Just Detect—Disrupt

Transaction fraud prevention is no longer just about stopping bad transactions. It’s about disrupting fraud networks, protecting customer trust, and reducing operational cost.

With the right strategy and systems in place, Singapore’s financial institutions can lead the region in smarter, safer finance.

Because when money moves fast, protection must move faster.

From Firefighting to Foresight: Rethinking Transaction Fraud Prevention in Singapore