Compliance Hub

Understanding PEPs: Definition, Types & Risk Levels According to FATF

Site Logo
Tookitaki
12 Oct 2021
7 min
read

The term "Politically Exposed Person" or PEP often comes up in conversations around anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT). But what exactly does it mean, and why should you care? When it comes to understanding what is a pep, it is essential to comprehend that these individuals possess great power, influence, and consequently, a higher propensity to engage in illicit activities such as bribery or money laundering

In this comprehensive guide, we'll explore the intricate world of PEPs, as outlined by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog, and shed light on the significance of PEP screening in financial institutions.

What is a PEP and PEP according to FATF

A Politically Exposed Person (PEP) is an individual who has been entrusted with a prominent public function, either domestically or internationally. Due to their position and influence, PEPs are at a higher risk of being involved in bribery, corruption, or money laundering. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) provides a detailed framework to understand the definition and types of PEPs, which serves as a global standard for nations and organizations alike.

Examples of PEP

PEPs are not just confined to politicians. They can also include senior government officials, judicial authorities, military officers, and even high-ranking members of state-owned enterprises. For instance, a mayor of a large city, a general in the army, or a CEO of a government-owned oil company could all be considered PEPs.

{{cta-first}}

PEPs, as per the FATF classification, embody individuals who currently serve or previously held a significant public function in a country. The high-risk nature of these roles is often associated with an enhanced likelihood of their involvement in financial crimes. This susceptibility stems from their ability to influence decisions and control resources, which can potentially be exploited for personal gains. The following categories encapsulate the diverse roles that a PEP may hold:

  • Government Roles: High-ranking officials in either the legislative, executive, or judiciary branches of government. This can range from members of parliament and supreme court judges to ambassadors and diplomats.
  • Organizational Roles: Individuals holding prominent positions in governmental commercial enterprises or political parties. This could include board members of a central bank, party leaders, or high-ranking military officials.
  • Associations: Close associates, either through social or professional connections, to a PEP. This could encompass family members, close relatives, or individuals holding beneficial ownership of a legal entity in which the government is a stakeholder.

Types of PEP Defined by FATF

Bearing in mind the broad scope of what is a PEP, the FATF has further divided PEPs into three primary categories, namely Foreign, Domestic, and International Organization PEPs.

  • Foreign PEPs: These are individuals who hold or have held prominent public positions in a foreign country. The risk associated with foreign PEPs is generally higher due to the challenges in obtaining accurate and timely data about these individuals.
  • Domestic PEPs: These refer to individuals who hold or have held significant public functions within their home country. While they also pose a risk, it is generally lower than that of their foreign counterparts due to better access to information.
  • International Organization PEPs: These are individuals who hold or have held a high-ranking position in an international organization. The risk associated with these PEPs can vary depending on factors such as the organization's transparency, the individual's role, and the level of oversight exercised.
HOW FATF CLASSIFIES PEPs

PEP Risk Levels

Understanding the PEP definition is only the first step in managing financial crime risks. The subsequent step involves a detailed risk assessment, which is crucial for regulated corporations dealing with PEPs. 

Risk associated with PEPs is generally assessed on multiple factors including the corruption level of the country they originate from, the nature of their role, and their access to significant financial resources. It's a tiered approach, ranging from low to high risk, and the scrutiny applied varies accordingly. The FATF outlines four levels of risk for PEPs:

  • Low-level risk: This encompasses supranational or international business officials and senior functionaries, as well as members of local, state, district, and urban assemblies.
  • Medium/low-level risk: This category includes top officials of government boards and state-owned enterprises such as heads of judiciaries, banks, military, law enforcement, and high-ranked civil servants in state agencies and religious organizations.
  • Medium/high-level risk: This segment includes individuals who are members of the government, parliament, judiciary, banks, law enforcement, military, and prominent political parties.
  • High-level risk: This is the highest risk category and includes heads of state or government, senior politicians, judicial or military officials, senior executives of state-owned corporations, and important party officials.

Red Flags to Watch Out for PEPs by FATF

Recognizing the potential risks associated with PEPs, the FATF has highlighted several red flags that can indicate suspicious activity. These indicators act as warning signals for possible financial abuse and can help corporations detect and control potential illegal activities involving PEPs. Here are some key red flags outlined by the FATF:

  • Unusual Wealth: A drastic and unexplained increase in a PEP's wealth can be a significant red flag.
  • Offshore Accounts: Frequent use of offshore accounts without a logical or apparent reason.
  • Shell Companies: Involvement in operations through shell companies that lack transparency.
  • Identity Concealment: PEPs might attempt to hide their identities to evade scrutiny. This could involve assigning legal ownership to another individual, frequently interacting with intermediaries, or using corporate structures to obscure ownership.
  • Suspicious Behavior: This could include secrecy about the source of funds, providing false or insufficient information, eagerness to justify business dealings, denial of an entry visa, or frequent movement of funds across countries.
  • Company Position: The PEP's position within the company could also raise concerns. This could include having control over the company's funds, operations, policies, or anti-money laundering/terrorist financing mechanisms.
  • Industry: Certain industries are considered high-risk due to their nature and the potential for exploitation. This could include banking and finance, military and defense, businesses dealing with government agencies, construction, mining and extraction, and public goods provision.

Changes in PEP Status: An Evolving Landscape

The PEP landscape has witnessed several changes over the years, primarily in the definition and monitoring of PEPs. The term PEP was initially used to describe senior government officials and their immediate family members only. However, the definition has since been expanded to include individuals who hold prominent positions in international organizations, as well as their close associates. This change reflects the evolving nature of the global economy, where non-governmental organizations and international institutions wield significant power and influence.

The monitoring of PEPs has also evolved. Previously, self-disclosure was the primary method to identify a PEP, which was often ineffective, as some PEPs chose to hide their status or failed to disclose it accurately. Today, governments and financial institutions have access to sophisticated databases and screening tools, thanks to advanced AML compliance software, enhancing the ability to detect potential money laundering and corruption risks associated with PEPs.

Why PEP Screening is Important

Financial crimes pose a significant global concern, and organizations are obligated to comply with anti-money laundering regulations to combat such crimes. As part of this compliance, institutions must identify customers who may have a higher risk of being involved in financial crimes. PEP screening is a crucial process during account opening that helps identify high-risk customers and prevent financial crimes. Failure to adhere to these screening procedures can result in penalties from AML regulators for non-compliant organizations.

PEP screening is crucial because these individuals are at a higher risk of involvement in bribery, corruption, and money laundering due to their position and influence. Failure to conduct proper screening can result in heavy fines for the institution and reputational damage. More importantly, it can facilitate financial crimes that have societal impacts.

How Tookitaki Can Help

As an award-winning regulatory technology (RegTech) company, we are revolutionising financial crime detection and prevention for banks and fintechs with our cutting-edge solutions. We provide an end-to-end, AI-powered AML compliance platform, named the Anti-Money Laundering Suite (AMLS), with modular solutions that help financial institutions deal with the ever-changing financial crime landscape.

Our Smart Screening solution provides accurate screening of names and transactions across many languages and a continuous monitoring framework for comprehensive risk management. Our powerful name-matching engine screens and prioritises all name search hits, helping to achieve 80% precision and 90% recall levels in screening programmes of financial institutions.

The features of our Smart Screening solution include:

  • Advanced machine learning engine that powers  50+ name-matching techniques
  • Comprehensive matching enabled by the use of multiple attributes i.e; name, address, gender, date of birth, incorporation and more
  • Individual language models to improve accuracy across 18+ languages and 10 different scripts
  • Built-in transliteration engine for effective cross-lingual matching
  • Scalable to support massive watchlist data

{{cta-ebook}}

Final Thoughts

In order to mitigate the risks associated with PEPs, it is imperative for financial institutions to implement robust PEP screening processes within their compliance framework. By doing so, they not only shield themselves from potential involvement in illicit activities but also safeguard their reputation and actively contribute to the global fight against financial crime.

Tookitaki's innovative Smart Screening solution offers precise screening of customers and transactions against sanctions, PEPs, Adverse Media, and various watchlists in real-time across over 22 languages. With an impressive 90% accuracy rate, this cutting-edge technology utilizes 12 advanced name-matching techniques on 7 customer attributes, incorporating a multi-stage matching mechanism and cross-lingual matching capabilities. To explore more about the capabilities of Tookitaki's screening solution, schedule a consultation session by clicking the link below.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is a PEP according to FATF?

A PEP, according to FATF, is an individual who is or has been entrusted with a prominent public function, making them a higher risk for involvement in bribery and corruption.

What are some examples of PEPs?

Examples include politicians, high-ranking military officials, and senior executives in state-owned corporations.

Why is PEP screening important?

PEP screening is crucial for mitigating the risk of financial crimes like money laundering and corruption, which could result in severe penalties and reputational damage for the financial institution involved.

What are the types of PEPs defined by FATF?

FATF defines several types of PEPs including domestic, foreign, and those in international organisations.

What are some red flags to watch for in PEPs?

Red flags include sudden wealth accumulation, frequent use of offshore accounts, and involvement with shell companies.

By submitting the form, you agree that your personal data will be processed to provide the requested content (and for the purposes you agreed to above) in accordance with the Privacy Notice

success icon

We’ve received your details and our team will be in touch shortly.

In the meantime, explore how Tookitaki is transforming financial crime prevention.
Learn More About Us
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Ready to Streamline Your Anti-Financial Crime Compliance?

Our Thought Leadership Guides

Blogs
17 Nov 2025
6 min
read

Connected Intelligence: How Modern AML System Software Is Redefining Compliance for a Real-Time World

The world’s fastest payments demand the world’s smartest defences — and that begins with a connected AML system built for intelligence, not just compliance.

Introduction

In the Philippines and across Southeast Asia, financial institutions are operating in a new reality. Digital wallets move money in seconds. Cross-border payments flow at massive scale. Fintechs onboard thousands of new users per day. Fraud and money laundering have become more coordinated, more invisible, and more intertwined with legitimate activity.

This transformation has put enormous pressure on compliance teams.
The legacy model — where screening, monitoring, and risk assessment sit in isolated tools — simply cannot keep pace with the velocity of today’s financial crime. Compliance can no longer rely on siloed systems or rules built for slower times.

What institutions need now is AML system software: an integrated platform that unifies every layer of financial crime prevention into one intelligent ecosystem. A system that sees the whole picture, not fragments of it. A system that learns, explains, collaborates, and adapts.

This is where next-generation AML platforms like Tookitaki’s FinCense are rewriting the rulebook.

Talk to an Expert

What Is AML System Software?

Unlike standalone AML tools that perform single tasks — such as screening or monitoring — AML system software brings together every major component of compliance into one cohesive platform.

At its core, it acts as the central nervous system of a financial institution’s defence strategy.

✔️ A modern AML system typically includes:

  • Customer and entity screening
  • Transaction monitoring
  • Customer risk scoring
  • Case management
  • Investigative workflows
  • Reporting and audit trails
  • AI-driven detection models
  • Integration with external intelligence sources

Each of these modules communicates with the others through a unified data layer.
The result: A system that understands context, connects patterns, and provides a consistent source of truth for compliance decisions.

✔️ Why this matters in a real-time banking environment

With instant payments now the norm in the Philippines, detection can no longer wait for batch processes. AML systems must operate with:

  • Low latency
  • High scalability
  • Continuous recalibration
  • Cross-channel visibility

Without a unified system, red flags go unnoticed, investigations take longer, and regulatory risk increases.

Why Legacy AML Systems Are Failing

Most legacy AML architectures — especially those used by older banks — were built 10 to 15 years ago. While reliable at the time, they cannot meet today’s demands.

1. Fragmented modules

Screening is handled in one tool. Monitoring is handled in another. Case management sits somewhere else.
These silos prevent the system from understanding the relationships between activities.

2. Excessive false positives

Static rules trigger alerts based on outdated thresholds, overwhelming analysts with noise and increasing operational costs.

3. Outdated analytical models

Legacy engines cannot ingest new data sources such as:

  • Mobile wallet activity
  • Crypto exchange behaviour
  • Cross-platform digital footprints

4. Manual investigations and reporting

Analysts often copy-paste data between systems, losing context and increasing risk of human error.

5. Poor explainability

Traditional models cannot justify decisions — a critical weakness in a world where regulators require full transparency.

6. Limited scalability

As transaction volumes surge (especially in fintechs and digital banks), old systems buckle under load.

The outcome? A compliance function that’s reactive, inefficient, and vulnerable.

Core Capabilities of Next-Gen AML System Software

Modern AML systems aren’t just upgraded tools — they are intelligent ecosystems designed for speed, accuracy, and interpretability.

1. Unified Intelligence Hub

The platform aggregates data from:

  • KYC
  • Transactions
  • Screening events
  • Customer behaviour
  • External watchlists
  • Third-party intelligence

This eliminates blind spots and enables end-to-end risk visibility.

2. AI-Driven Detection

Machine learning models adapt to emerging patterns — identifying:

  • Layering behaviours
  • Round-tripping
  • Smurfing
  • Synthetic identity patterns
  • Crypto-to-fiat movement
  • Mule account networks

Instead of relying solely on rules, the system learns from real behaviour.

3. Agentic AI Copilot

The introduction of Agentic AI has transformed AML investigations.
Unlike traditional AI, Agentic AI can reason, summarise, and proactively assist investigators.

Tookitaki’s FinMate is a prime example:

  • Investigators can ask questions in plain language
  • The system generates investigation summaries
  • It highlights relationships and risk factors
  • It surfaces anomalies and inconsistencies
  • It supports SAR/STR preparation

This marks a seismic leap in compliance productivity.

4. Federated Learning

A breakthrough innovation pioneered by Tookitaki.
Federated learning enables multiple institutions to strengthen models without sharing confidential data.

This means a bank in the Philippines can benefit from patterns observed in:

  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • Indonesia
  • Rest of the World

All while keeping customer data secure.

5. Explainable AI

Modern AML systems embed transparency at every step:

  • Why was an alert generated?
  • Which behaviours contributed to risk?
  • Which model features influenced the score?
  • How does this compare to peer behaviour?

Explainability builds regulator trust and eliminates black-box decision-making.

ChatGPT Image Nov 17, 2025, 11_09_18 AM

Tookitaki FinCense — The Intelligent AML System

FinCense is Tookitaki’s end-to-end AML system software designed to unify monitoring, screening, scoring, and investigation into one adaptive platform.

Modular yet integrated architecture

FinCense brings together:

  • FRAML Platform
  • Smart Screening
  • Onboarding Risk Suite
  • Customer Risk Scoring

Every component feeds into the same intelligence backbone — ensuring contextual, consistent outcomes.

Designed for compliance teams, not just data teams

FinCense provides:

  • Intuitive dashboards
  • Natural-language insights
  • Behaviour-based analytics
  • Risk heatmaps
  • Investigator-friendly interfaces

Built on modern cloud-native architecture

With support for:

  • Kubernetes (auto-scaling)
  • High-volume stream processing
  • Real-time alerting
  • Flexible deployment (cloud, on-prem, hybrid)

FinCense supports both traditional banks and high-growth digital fintechs with minimal infrastructure strain.

Agentic AI and FinMate — The Heart of Modern Investigations

Traditional case management is slow, repetitive, and prone to human error.
FinMate — Tookitaki’s Agentic AI copilot — changes that.

FinMate helps investigators by:

  • Highlighting suspicious behaviour patterns
  • Analysing multi-account linkages
  • Drafting case summaries
  • Recommending disposition actions
  • Explaining model decisions
  • Answering natural-language queries
  • Surfacing hidden risks analysts may overlook

Example

An investigator can ask:

“Show all connected accounts with unusual transactions in the last 60 days.”

FinMate instantly:

  • Analyses graph relationships
  • Summarises behavioural anomalies
  • Highlights risk factors
  • Visualises linkages

This accelerates investigation speed, improves accuracy, and strengthens regulatory confidence.

Case in Focus: How a Philippine Bank Modernised Its AML System

A leading bank and digital wallet provider in the Philippines partnered with Tookitaki to replace its legacy FICO-based AML system with FinCense.

The transformation was dramatic.

The Results

  • >90% reduction in false positives
  • >95% alert accuracy
  • 10× faster scenario deployment
  • 75% reduction in alert volume
  • Screening over 40 million customers
  • Processing 1 billion+ transactions

What made the difference?

  • Integrated architecture reducing fragmentation
  • Adaptive AI models fine-tuning detection logic
  • FinMate accelerating investigation turnaround
  • Federated intelligence shaping detection scenarios
  • Strong model governance improving regulator trust

This deployment has since become a benchmark for large-scale AML transformation in the region.

The Role of the AFC Ecosystem: Shared Defence for a Shared Problem

Financial crime doesn’t operate within borders — and neither should detection.

The Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) Ecosystem, powered by Tookitaki, serves as a collaborative platform for sharing:

  • Red flags
  • Typologies
  • Scenarios
  • Trend analyses
  • Federated Insight Cards

Why this matters

  • Financial institutions gain early visibility into emerging risks.
  • Philippine banks benefit from scenarios first seen abroad.
  • Typology coverage remains updated without manual research.
  • Models adapt faster using federated learning signals.

The AFC Ecosystem turns AML from a siloed function into a collaborative advantage.

Why Integration Matters in Modern AML Systems

As fraud, compliance, cybersecurity, and risk converge, AML cannot operate in isolation.

Integrated systems enable:

  • Cross-channel behaviour detection
  • Unified customer risk profiles
  • Faster investigations
  • Consistent controls across business units
  • Lower operational overhead
  • Better alignment with enterprise governance

With Tookitaki’s cloud-native and Kubernetes-based architecture, FinCense allows institutions to scale while maintaining high performance and resilience.

The Future of AML System Software

The next wave of AML systems will be defined by:

1. Predictive intelligence

Systems that forecast crime before it occurs.

2. Real-time ecosystem collaboration

Shared typologies across regulators, banks, and fintechs.

3. Embedded explainability

Full transparency built directly into model logic.

4. Integrated AML–fraud ecosystems

Unified platforms covering fraud, money laundering, sanctions, and risk.

5. Agentic AI as an industry standard

AI copilots becoming central to investigations and reporting.

Tookitaki’s Trust Layer vision — combining intelligence, transparency, and collaboration — is aligned directly with this future.

Conclusion

The era of fragmented AML tools is ending.
The future belongs to institutions that embrace connected intelligence — unified systems that learn, explain, and collaborate.

Modern AML system software like Tookitaki’s FinCense is more than a compliance solution. It is the backbone of a resilient, fast, and trusted financial ecosystem.

It empowers banks and fintechs to:

  • Detect risk earlier
  • Investigate faster
  • Collaborate smarter
  • Satisfy regulators with confidence
  • And build trust with every transaction

The world is moving toward real-time finance — and the only way forward is with real-time, intelligent AML systems guiding the way.

Connected Intelligence: How Modern AML System Software Is Redefining Compliance for a Real-Time World
Blogs
17 Nov 2025
6 min
read

The AML Technology Maturity Curve: How Australian Banks Can Evolve from Legacy to Intelligence

Every Australian bank sits somewhere on the AML technology maturity curve. The real question is how fast they can move from manual processes to intelligent, collaborative systems built for tomorrow’s risks.

Introduction

Australian banks are entering a new era of AML transformation. Regulatory expectations from AUSTRAC and APRA are rising, financial crime is becoming more complex, and payment speeds continue to increase. Traditional tools can no longer keep pace with new behaviours, criminal networks, or the speed of modern financial systems.

This has created a clear divide between institutions still dependent on legacy compliance systems and those evolving toward intelligent AML platforms that learn, adapt, and collaborate.

Understanding where a bank sits on the AML technology maturity curve is the first step. Knowing how to evolve along that curve is what will define the next decade of Australian compliance.

Talk to an Expert

What Is the AML Technology Maturity Curve?

The maturity curve represents the journey banks undertake from manual and reactive systems to intelligent, data-driven, and collaborative AML ecosystems.

It typically includes four stages:

  1. Foundational AML (Manual + Rule-Based)
  2. Operational AML (Automated + Centralised)
  3. Intelligent AML (AI-Enabled + Explainable)
  4. Collaborative AML (Networked + Federated Learning)

Each stage reflects not just technology upgrades, but shifts in mindset, culture, and organisational capability.

Stage 1: Foundational AML — Manual Effort and Fragmented Systems

This stage is defined by legacy processes and significant manual burden. Many institutions, especially small to mid-sized players, still rely on these systems out of necessity.

Key Characteristics

  • Spreadsheets, forms, and manual checklists.
  • Basic rule-based transaction monitoring.
  • Limited customer risk segmentation.
  • Disconnected onboarding, screening, and monitoring tools.
  • Alerts reviewed manually with little context.

Challenges

  • High false positives.
  • Inability to detect new or evolving typologies.
  • Human fatigue leading to missed red flags.
  • Slow reporting and investigation cycles.
  • Minimal auditability or explainability.

The Result

Compliance becomes reactive instead of proactive. Teams operate in constant catch-up mode, and knowledge stays fragmented across individuals rather than shared across the organisation.

Stage 2: Operational AML — Automation and Centralisation

Banks typically enter this stage when they consolidate systems and introduce automation to reduce workload.

Key Characteristics

  • Automated transaction screening and monitoring.
  • Centralised case management.
  • Better data integration across departments.
  • Improved reporting workflows.
  • Standardised rules, typologies, and thresholds.

Benefits

  • Reduced manual fatigue.
  • Faster case resolution.
  • More consistent documentation.
  • Early visibility into suspicious activity.

Remaining Gaps

  • Systems still behave rigidly.
  • Thresholds need constant human tuning.
  • Limited ability to detect unknown patterns.
  • Alerts often lack nuance or context.
  • High dependency on human interpretation.

Banks in this stage have control, but not intelligence. They know what is happening, but not always why.

Stage 3: Intelligent AML — AI-Enabled, Explainable, and Context-Driven

This is where banks begin to transform compliance into a data-driven discipline. Artificial intelligence augments human capability, helping analysts make faster, clearer, and more confident decisions.

Key Characteristics

  • Machine learning models that learn from past cases.
  • Behavioural analytics that detect deviations from normal patterns.
  • Risk scoring informed by customer behaviour, profile, and history.
  • Explainable AI that shows why alerts were triggered.
  • Reduced false positives and improved precision.

What Changes at This Stage

  • Investigators move from data processing to data interpretation.
  • Alerts come with narrative and context, not just flags.
  • Systems identify emerging behaviours rather than predefined rules alone.
  • AML teams gain confidence that models behave consistently and fairly.

Why This Matters in Australia

AUSTRAC and APRA both emphasise transparency, auditability, and explainability. Intelligent AML systems satisfy these expectations while enabling faster and more accurate detection.

Example: Regional Australia Bank

Regional Australia Bank demonstrates how smaller institutions can adopt intelligent AML practices without complexity. By embracing explainable AI and automated analytics, the bank strengthens compliance without overburdening staff. This approach proves that intelligence is not about size. It is about strategy.

Stage 4: Collaborative AML — Federated Intelligence and Networked Learning

This is the most advanced stage — one that only a handful of institutions globally have reached. Instead of fighting financial crime alone, banks collectively strengthen each other through secure networks.

Key Characteristics

  • Federated learning models that improve using anonymised patterns across institutions.
  • Shared scenario intelligence that updates continuously.
  • Real-time insight exchange on emerging typologies.
  • Cross-bank collaboration without sharing sensitive data.
  • AI models that adapt faster because they learn from broader experience.

Why This Is the Future

Criminals collaborate. Financial institutions traditionally do not.

This creates an asymmetry that benefits the wrong side.

Collaborative AML levels the playing field by ensuring banks learn not only from their own cases, but from the collective experience of a wider ecosystem.

How Tookitaki Leads Here

The AFC Ecosystem enables privacy-preserving collaboration across banks in Asia-Pacific.
Tookitaki’s FinCense uses federated learning to allow banks to benefit from shared intelligence while keeping customer data completely private.

This is the “Trust Layer” in action — compliance strengthened through collective insight.

ChatGPT Image Nov 17, 2025, 10_43_25 AM

The Maturity Curve Is Not About Technology Alone

Progression along the curve requires more than software upgrades. It requires changes in:

1. Culture

Teams must evolve from reactive rule-followers to proactive risk thinkers.

2. Leadership

Executives must see compliance as a strategic asset, not a cost centre.

3. Data Capability

Banks need clean, consistent, and governed data to support intelligent detection.

4. Skills and Mindset

Investigators need training not just on systems, but on behavioural analysis, fraud psychology, and AI interpretation.

5. Governance

Model oversight, validation, and accountability should mature in parallel with technology.

No bank can reach Stage 4 without strengthening all five pillars.

Mapping the Technology Journey for Australian Banks

Here is a practical roadmap tailored to Australia’s regulatory and operational environment.

Step 1: Assess the Current State

Banks must begin with an honest assessment of where they sit on the maturity curve.

Key questions include:

  • How manual is the current alert review process?
  • How frequently are thresholds tuned?
  • Are models explainable to AUSTRAC during audits?
  • Do investigators have too much or too little context?
  • Is AML data unified or fragmented?

A maturity gap analysis provides clarity and direction.

Step 2: Clean and Consolidate Data

Before intelligence comes data integrity.
This includes:

  • Removing duplicates.
  • Standardising formats.
  • Governing access through clear controls.
  • Fixing data lineage issues.
  • Integrating onboarding, screening, and monitoring systems.

Clean data is the runway for intelligent AML.

Step 3: Introduce Explainable AI

The move from rules to AI must start with transparency.

Transparent AI:

  • Shows why an alert was triggered.
  • Reduces false positives.
  • Builds regulator confidence.
  • Helps junior investigators learn faster.

Explainability builds trust and is essential under AUSTRAC expectations.

Step 4: Deploy an Agentic AI Copilot

This is where Tookitaki’s FinMate becomes transformational.

FinMate:

  • Provides contextual insights automatically.
  • Suggests investigative steps.
  • Generates summaries and narratives.
  • Helps analysts understand behavioural patterns.
  • Reduces cognitive load and improves decision quality.

Agentic AI is the bridge between human expertise and machine intelligence.

Step 5: Adopt Federated Scenario Intelligence

Once foundational and intelligent components are in place, banks can join collaborative networks.

Federated learning allows banks to:

  • Learn from global typologies.
  • Detect new patterns faster.
  • Strengthen AML without sharing private data.
  • Keep pace with criminals who evolve rapidly.

This is the highest stage of maturity and the foundation of the Trust Layer.

Why Many Banks Struggle to Advance the Curve

1. Legacy Core Systems

Old infrastructure slows down data processing and integration.

2. Resource Constraints

Training and transformation require investment.

3. Misaligned Priorities

Short-term firefighting disrupts long-term transformation.

4. Lack of AI Skills

Teams often lack expertise in model governance and explainability.

5. Overwhelming Alert Volumes

Teams cannot focus on strategic progression when they are drowning in alerts.

Transformation requires both vision and support.

How Tookitaki Helps Australian Banks Progress

Tookitaki’s FinCense platform is purpose-built to help banks move confidently across all stages of the maturity curve.

Stage 1 to Stage 2

  • Consolidated case management.
  • Automation of screening and monitoring.

Stage 2 to Stage 3

  • Explainable AI.
  • Behavioural analytics.
  • Agentic investigation support through FinMate.

Stage 3 to Stage 4

  • Federated learning.
  • Ecosystem-driven scenario intelligence.
  • Collaborative model updates.

No other solution in Australia combines the depth of intelligence with the integrity of a federated, privacy-preserving network.

The Future: The Intelligent, Networked AML Bank

The direction is clear.
Australian banks that will thrive are those that:

  • Treat compliance as a strategic differentiator.
  • Empower teams with both intelligence and explainability.
  • Evolve beyond rule-chasing toward behavioural insight.
  • Collaborate securely with peers to outpace criminal networks.
  • Move from siloed, static systems to adaptive, AI-driven frameworks.

The question is no longer whether banks should evolve.
It is how quickly they can.

Conclusion

The AML technology maturity curve is more than a roadmap — it is a strategic lens through which banks can evaluate their readiness for the future.

As payment speeds increase and criminal networks evolve, the ability to move from legacy systems to intelligent, collaborative platforms will define the leaders in Australian compliance.

Regional Australia Bank has already demonstrated that even community institutions can embrace intelligent transformation with the right tools and mindset.

With Tookitaki’s FinCense and FinMate, the journey does not require massive infrastructure change. It requires a commitment to transparent AI, better data, cross-bank learning, and a culture that sees compliance as a long-term advantage.

Pro tip: The next generation of AML excellence will belong to banks that learn faster than criminals evolve — and that requires intelligent, networked systems from end to end.

The AML Technology Maturity Curve: How Australian Banks Can Evolve from Legacy to Intelligence
Blogs
11 Nov 2025
6 min
read

Compliance Transaction Monitoring in 2025: How to Catch Criminals Before the Regulator Calls

When it comes to financial crime, what you don't see can hurt you — badly.

Compliance transaction monitoring has become one of the most critical safeguards for banks, payment companies, and fintechs in Singapore. As fraud syndicates evolve faster than policy manuals and cross-border transfers accelerate risk, regulators like MAS expect institutions to know — and act on — what flows through their systems in real time.

This blog explores the rising importance of compliance transaction monitoring, what modern systems must offer, and how institutions in Singapore can transform it from a cost centre into a strategic weapon.

Talk to an Expert

What is Compliance Transaction Monitoring?

Compliance transaction monitoring refers to the real-time and post-event analysis of financial transactions to detect potentially suspicious or illegal activity. It helps institutions:

  • Flag unusual behaviour or rule violations
  • File timely Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs)
  • Maintain audit trails and regulator readiness
  • Prevent regulatory penalties and reputational damage

Unlike simple fraud checks, compliance monitoring is focused on regulatory risk. It must detect typologies like:

  • Structuring and smurfing
  • Rapid pass-through activity
  • Transactions with sanctioned entities
  • Use of mule accounts or shell companies
  • Crypto-to-fiat layering across borders

Why It’s No Longer Optional

Singapore’s financial institutions operate in a tightly regulated, high-risk environment. Here’s why compliance monitoring has become essential:

1. Stricter MAS Expectations

MAS expects real-time monitoring for high-risk customers and instant STR submissions. Inaction or delay can lead to enforcement actions, as seen in recent cases involving lapses in transaction surveillance.

2. Rise of Scam Syndicates and Layering Tactics

Criminals now use multi-step, cross-border techniques — including local fintech wallets and QR-based payments — to mask their tracks. Static rules can't keep up.

3. Proliferation of Real-Time Payments (RTP)

Instant transfers mean institutions must detect and act within seconds. Delayed detection equals lost funds, poor customer experience, and missed regulatory thresholds.

4. More Complex Product Offerings

As financial institutions expand into crypto, embedded finance, and Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL), transaction monitoring must adapt across new product flows and risk scenarios.

Core Components of a Compliance Transaction Monitoring System

1. Real-Time Monitoring Engine

Must process transactions as they happen. Look for features like:

  • Risk scoring in milliseconds
  • AI-driven anomaly detection
  • Transaction blocking capabilities

2. Rules + Typology-Based Detection

Modern systems go beyond static thresholds. They offer:

  • Dynamic scenario libraries (e.g., layering through utility bill payments)
  • Community-contributed risk typologies (like those in the AFC Ecosystem)
  • Granular segmentation by product, region, and customer type

3. False Positive Suppression

High false positives exhaust compliance teams. Leading systems use:

  • Feedback learning loops
  • Entity link analysis
  • Explainable AI to justify why alerts are generated

4. Integrated Case Management

Efficient workflows matter. Features should include:

  • Auto-populated customer and transaction data
  • Investigation notes, tags, and collaboration features
  • Automated SAR/STR filing templates

5. Regulatory Alignment and Audit Trail

Your system should:

  • Map alerts to regulatory obligations (e.g., MAS Notice 626)
  • Maintain immutable logs for all decisions
  • Provide on-demand reporting and dashboards for regulators

How Banks in Singapore Are Innovating

AI Copilots for Investigations

Banks are using AI copilots to assist investigators by summarising alert history, surfacing key risk indicators, and even drafting STRs. This boosts productivity and improves quality.

Scenario Simulation Before Deployment

Top systems offer a sandbox to test new scenarios (like pig butchering scams or shell company layering) before applying them to live environments.

Federated Learning Across Institutions

Without sharing data, banks can now benefit from detection models trained on broader industry patterns. Tookitaki’s AFC Ecosystem powers this for FinCense users.

ChatGPT Image Nov 7, 2025, 12_55_33 PM

Common Mistakes Institutions Make

1. Treating Monitoring as a Checkbox Exercise

Just meeting compliance requirements is not enough. Regulators now expect proactive detection and contextual understanding.

2. Over-Reliance on Threshold-Based Alerts

Static rules like “flag any transfer above $10,000” miss sophisticated laundering patterns. They also trigger excess false positives.

3. No Feedback Loop

If investigators can’t teach the system which alerts were useful or not, the platform won’t improve. Feedback-driven systems are the future.

4. Ignoring End-User Experience

Blocking customer transfers without explanation, or frequent false alarms, can erode trust. Balance risk mitigation with customer experience.

Future Trends in Compliance Transaction Monitoring

1. Agentic AI Takes the Lead

More systems are deploying AI agents that don’t just analyse data — they act. Agents can triage alerts, trigger escalations, and explain decisions in plain language.

2. API-First Monitoring for Fintechs

To keep up with embedded finance, AML systems must offer flexible APIs to plug directly into payment platforms, neobanks, and lending stacks.

3. Risk-Based Alert Narration

Auto-generated narratives summarising why a transaction is risky — using customer behaviour, transaction pattern, and scenario match — are replacing manual reporting.

4. Synthetic Data for Model Training

To avoid data privacy issues, synthetic (fake but realistic) transaction datasets are being used to test and improve AML detection models.

5. Cross-Border Intelligence Sharing

As scams travel across borders, shared typology intelligence through ecosystems like Tookitaki’s AFC Network becomes critical.

Spotlight: Tookitaki’s FinCense Platform

Tookitaki’s FinCense offers an end-to-end compliance transaction monitoring solution built for fast-evolving Asian markets.

Key Features:

  • Community-sourced typologies via the AFC Ecosystem
  • FinMate AI Copilot for real-time investigation support
  • Pre-configured MAS-aligned rules
  • Federated Learning for smarter detection models
  • Cloud-native, API-first deployment for banks and fintechs

FinCense has helped leading institutions in Singapore achieve:

  • 3.5x faster case resolutions
  • 72% reduction in false positives
  • Over 99% STR submission accuracy

How to Select the Right Compliance Monitoring Partner

Ask potential vendors:

  1. How often do you update typologies?
  2. Can I simulate a new scenario without going live?
  3. How does your system handle Singapore-specific risks?
  4. Do investigators get explainable AI support?
  5. Is the platform modular and API-driven?

Conclusion: Compliance is the New Competitive Edge

In 2025, compliance transaction monitoring is no longer just about avoiding fines — it’s about maintaining trust, protecting customers, and staying ahead of criminal innovation.

Banks, fintechs, and payments firms that invest in AI-powered, scenario-driven monitoring systems will not only reduce compliance risk but also improve operational efficiency.

With tools like Tookitaki’s FinCense, institutions in Singapore can turn transaction monitoring into a strategic advantage — one that stops bad actors before the damage is done.

Compliance Transaction Monitoring in 2025: How to Catch Criminals Before the Regulator Calls